beyond facts to effective action ... we help our clients create the future

 

Technology User Profile®

TUP Overview

Request for Information

Request Form

Reference

Search

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                     

   

Technology-Rich Metros Increase Their Distance From Others – MetaFacts TUPdate #030428
Dan Ness, Principal Analyst, MetaFacts, April 28, 2003
 

Executive Summary

 
Technology-Intense Centers
There are strong regional differences in the amount and variety of technology products and services used. It should come as no surprise that Silicon Valley is the most technology-intense region in the U.S.

The San Jose MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Area) has a TECHii (Technology Intensity Index) score of 125.0, meaning that adults in this region use a quarter higher combinations of technology products and services than the U.S. average.

San Jose has one of the highest rates of households with computer users (87%) as well as one of the highest rates of high-bandwidth usage (44%).

The Oakland, California MSA is ranked second in the nation for technology intensity with an index of 122.2, also driven by a high PC user penetration (81%) and high-bandwidth Internet usage (47%) as well as high cellphone penetration (75%).

Austin, Texas, places a close third, with a combination of very high PC usage (85%), high-bandwidth Internet usage (37%), and high cellphone penetration (70%).

Of the MSAs with an above-average Technology Intensity Index, 8 are in California, and 4 are in Texas, and 1 each in New Jersey and Florida.

 
PC-Rich and PC-Poor Metros
The Salt Lake City – Ogden, Utah MSA is top in the nation for PC usage, with 89% of households having at least one adult using a PC at home, in a workplace, or for self-employment. This is closely followed by San Jose, California at 87%. At third place nationwide, Austin-San Marcos, Texas weighs in at 85%. These three metros have a strong balance of technology industries, universities, affluence and families, all factors that are closely linked to computer and Internet usage.
 
Cellphone-Penetrated Metros
Cellphone penetration has continued to climb and approach PC penetration, which has flattened. Many of the MSAs with the highest cellphone penetration also have strong PC, Internet and other technology usage. The top MSA for cellphone penetration is Bergen-Passaic, New Jersey, at 80% of households, far ahead of the 64% national average. This MSA, ranked 16th on the Technology Intensity Index, also has a high penetration of PC users and above-average high-bandwidth Internet and digital camera use. Second nationwide, Fort Lauderdale, Florida has 78% of its households with a cellphone user.

Four MSAs are tied for third-place in cellphone penetration, at 76%: Newark, New Jersey; Atlanta, Georgia; Nassau-Suffolk, New York; and Monmouth-Ocean, New Jersey.

 
High-Bandwidth Centers
The Oakland, California MSA outpaces Silicon Valley (San Jose, California) with 47% compared with 44% of households having a high-bandwidth Internet connection. These are closely followed by Long Island (Nassau-Suffolk, New York) and Orange County, California, both at 42%. Even the lowest MSA of the top twelve, Boston-Lawrence-Lowell-Brockton, has a full third (33%) of its households with a high-bandwidth connection. This is well above the national average of 25% of households, and the 15% level in the rural non-MSA areas.

Of the dozen MSAs with the highest percentage using high-bandwidth Internet connections, most of these are using Cable connections as compared with DSL. There are many reasons that some metros have higher-bandwidth Internet connections available as compared to others. Some of the reasons are competitive forces and actions on the parts of the local telephone companies and cable companies. These companies are aggressively trying to capture what they see as a lucrative market while competing with each other. At the same time, fundamental restrictions on the limits of distance make the economics of dense, concentrated markets more attractive than rural or even some suburban markets.

 
Background & Methodology
Measuring the household penetration and individual usage levels of computer and communication technology are key factors closely monitored by both the technology community as well as more recently by public policy makers. For nearly two decades, it has also formed the starting point for the Technology User Profile study. Through our other historical statistical analysis, as well as that of many sociodemographers and database marketers, there are many factors that affect and reinforce who uses and doesn’t use technology, such as educational level, household income, family status, occupation, employment status and race. Further, these and other factors are interrelated to where people live.

This article reports on the key measures of penetration and usage on a geographic level, reviewing each of 321 MSAs (Metropolitan Statistical Areas) using the most recent results from the nationwide 2003 Technology User Profile 2003 Annual Edition. The preliminary results from this wave are based on 24,713 completed surveys conducted offline among a representative population of American adults. To calculate the TECHii score (Technology Intensity Index) for each MSA, we combine the relative penetration of each technology product or service weighted by the average annual expenditure. This factor is then compared to the national average, to give a relative index. An index of 110 means that the households in the MSA spend 10% more than the national average per household for the selected technology products and services. Similarly, an index of 80 means that the MSA spends at 80% of the national average level. The technology products and services include personal computers, the Internet, digital cameras, game consoles, cellular phones, DSL & Cable High-Bandwidth Internet connections, and others.

 

Links to Full Document

For the complete TUPdate, please follow this link to the full document.
 
Other Resources
Current TUP subscribers may be interested in the following links with related, more detailed or updated information:

MSAs by Cellphone Penetration (TUPan03p) (Excel)

Cell-dominant MSAs by Cellphone Penetration (TUPan03p) (Excel)

MSAs by PC Non Penetration (TUPan03p) (Excel)

MSAs by Any PC Penetration (TUPan03p) (Excel)

MSAs by TECHii score (TUPan03p) (Excel)

MSAs by High-Bandwidth Internet usage (TUPan03p) (Excel)

 

Usage Guidelines

This TUPdate is provided as a service to subscribers of the MetaFacts Technology User Profile® service, technology marketers, the investment community and other interested parties. Current Technology User Profile subscribers may freely distribute this information within their firms. Further information about Technology User Profile can be obtained at the website www.technologyuser.com or by contacting us at:




If you would like to unsubscribe, please complete the unsubscribe form. If you were forwarded this TUPdate and wish to get on the list for future articles, please
complete a subscription request form.

   
                           

Home

For questions or comments about this web site, please send requests to webmaster.
Copyright © 1998-2008
Technology User Profile® is a registered trademark of MetaFacts, Inc.